Standing Buddha

GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Following the fall of the Mon-Dvaravati kingdom in the 11th century, Khmer rule extended into Thailand and remained dominant into the 13th century. The central Thai city of Lopburi, which gives its name to the period style of this large-scale Buddha, was both the political and artistic center of the region. The school of art that developed drew upon the iconography and aesthetic of the earlier Buddhist Mon-Dvaravati kingdom, which had ruled in the region, but which became increasingly influ­enced by Khmer artistic traditions.

While Hinduism remained the royal religion in Cambodia until the end of the 12th century, the preponderance of Buddhist art in Thailand indicates that Buddhism continued as the primary reli­gion even when the region was under Khmer rule. Buddhist imagery includes buddhas seated under a naga (half human, half serpentine semi-divine beings), standing buddhas with two hands raised in a ges­ture of teaching (vitarka mudra), and in the northeast, particularly at the Vajrayana Buddhist temple of Phimai, more esoteric forms of buddhas and bodhisattvas.
The gesture, two hands raised with palms outward in ham samut (forbidding the ocean pose), was one that became popular in the 12th century. It prob­ably refers to the Buddha’s display of supernatural powers by his holding back floodwaters when converting his disciple Kassapa.[1] If this interpretation is correct, it might also explain why the Buddha is shown wearing extravagant jewels and a crown—part of his supernatural display— instead of his usual monk’s garb.
In fact, the story of the Buddha’s dis­play in Kassapa’s conversion is akin to another interpretation of why the Buddha is sometimes adorned: the legend of his appearance to king Jambupati. However, the proximity of the sculpture in date to the important Tantric Buddhist center of Phimai in the northeast may also provide the key to his adornment, as the crowning of the Buddha is part of certain Vajrayana initiation rites. At any rate, many Buddhas of the period are adorned, and the jew­elry of this figure is consistent with the tendency, though it is more elaborate, par­ticularly in its extensive inlay.
[1] This gesture, with the hand raised, palm facing out, is called abhaya mudra in Sanskrit. See Hiram W. Woodward, Jr., “The Buddha Images of Ayutthaya,” in McGill and Chirapravati 2005, 54, and 109–110, and Woodward 1997, 86. I would like to thank Hiram Woodward for our discussion of stylistic issues regarding this piece.

Excerpt from
Nancy Tingley, "Standing Buddha," in The Arts of India, Southeast Asia, and the Himalayas, Anne R. Bromberg (Dallas: Dallas Museum of Art; New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013), 236.

NOTES
Citation for thermoluminescence fun fact: Thermoluminescence analysis report N205b82, Oxford Authentication Ltd., September 9, 2005. Two samples were taken. Citation and fun fact also excerpted from Tingley. 

ASSOCIATED CONTENT CHUNKS (list applicable note links)

AUDIO ASSETS 
  • 287181993: UMO
Pop-up Art Spot  - storytelling listening activity about 2006.21. 

VIDEO ASSETS 

IMAGE ASSETS 
8189884: UMO 

WEB RESOURCES 

ARCHIVAL RESOURCES (digitized/non-digitized)

FUN FACTS 
  • Scientific testing of this bronze through thermoluminescence analysis has yielded a date range of 600 to 1,000 years ago. 

TEACHING IDEAS 

RULES
apply to objects where number equals 2006.21



Category
rules_operator
AND
General Description
Following the fall of the Mon-Dvaravati kingdom in the 11th century, Khmer rule extended into Thailand and remained dominant into the 13th century. The central Thai city of Lopburi, which gives its name to the period style of this large-scale Buddha, was both the political and artistic center of the region. The school of art that developed drew upon the iconography and aesthetic of the earlier Buddhist Mon-Dvaravati kingdom, which had ruled in the region, but which became increasingly influ­enced by Khmer artistic traditions.

While Hinduism remained the royal religion in Cambodia until the end of the 12th century, the preponderance of Buddhist art in Thailand indicates that Buddhism continued as the primary reli­gion even when the region was under Khmer rule. Buddhist imagery includes buddhas seated under a naga (half human, half serpentine semi-divine beings), standing buddhas with two hands raised in a ges­ture of teaching (vitarka mudra), and in the northeast, particularly at the Vajrayana Buddhist temple of Phimai, more esoteric forms of buddhas and bodhisattvas.
The gesture, two hands raised with palms outward in ham samut (forbidding the ocean pose), was one that became popular in the 12th century. It prob­ably refers to the Buddha’s display of supernatural powers by his holding back floodwaters when converting his disciple Kassapa.[1] If this interpretation is correct, it might also explain why the Buddha is shown wearing extravagant jewels and a crown—part of his supernatural display— instead of his usual monk’s garb.
In fact, the story of the Buddha’s dis­play in Kassapa’s conversion is akin to another interpretation of why the Buddha is sometimes adorned: the legend of his appearance to king Jambupati. However, the proximity of the sculpture in date to the important Tantric Buddhist center of Phimai in the northeast may also provide the key to his adornment, as the crowning of the Buddha is part of certain Vajrayana initiation rites. At any rate, many Buddhas of the period are adorned, and the jew­elry of this figure is consistent with the tendency, though it is more elaborate, par­ticularly in its extensive inlay.
[1] This gesture, with the hand raised, palm facing out, is called abhaya mudra in Sanskrit. See Hiram W. Woodward, Jr., “The Buddha Images of Ayutthaya,” in McGill and Chirapravati 2005, 54, and 109–110, and Woodward 1997, 86. I would like to thank Hiram Woodward for our discussion of stylistic issues regarding this piece.

Excerpt from
Nancy Tingley, "Standing Buddha," in The Arts of India, Southeast Asia, and the Himalayas, Anne R. Bromberg (Dallas: Dallas Museum of Art; New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013), 236.

Fun Facts
 
  • Scientific testing of this bronze through thermoluminescence analysis has yielded a date range of 600 to 1,000 years ago. 

Archival Resources
(digitized/non-digitized)

Web Resources
 

Notes
Citation for thermoluminescence fun fact: Thermoluminescence analysis report N205b82, Oxford Authentication Ltd., September 9, 2005. Two samples were taken. Citation and fun fact also excerpted from Tingley. 

rules
Apply To
Objects
number
Equals
2006.21
tags
#draft
#completed
%copyedited_Gail
sculpture: AAT: 300047090
standing: AAT: 300239500
%Archived
jewelry: AAT: 300209286
king: AAT: 300025481
@Bilal-Gore
*Arts of Asia
@Courtney
Buddha: AAT: 300262950
Buddhism: AAT: 300073738
buddhas (people): AAT: 300404698
crowns (headdresses): AAT: 300046020
bronze: AAT: 300010957
gilding (material): AAT: 300379350
gold leaf: AAT: 300264831
Cambodia (nation): TGN: 1000109
Khmer: AAT: 300386546
Thailand: TGN: 1000142
Lopburi: AAT: 300019214
nagas (spirits): AAT: 300395659
Phimai (inhabited place): TGN: 1085636
287181993: UMO
8189884: UMO
source file
in_focus-0239.xml.nores